Tit for Tat

<body topmargin=0 leftmargin=0 marginheight=0 marginwidth=0> <table cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr> <td valign="top" rowspan="2" width=18.75% BGCOLOR="#99CC99" TEXT="#080000" bgproperties="fixed" background="03f8dfc3.jpg"> <div> <A HREF="id19.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="True Path"><U>True Path</U></A></div> <div> <B><IMG BORDER="0" SRC="Symb075c00b700c800000000.png" HEIGHT="13" WIDTH="24" ALIGN="bottom" HSPACE="0" VSPACE="0">Tit for Tat</B></div> <div> <A HREF="id18.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Sex Love"><U>Sex & Love</U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id82.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Inside Out"><U>Inside Out</U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id17.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Chapter Nine"><U>Chapter Nine</U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id28.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Poems, plays novels"><U>Poems, plays & novels</U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id81.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Articles"><U>Articles</U></A></div> <div> <A HREF="id23.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Contact Neil "><U>Contact Neil </U></A></div> <bR> </td> <td valign="top" colspan=2 height=100 BGCOLOR="#CCCC99" TEXT="#080000" bgproperties="fixed" background="0408dfe1esnpes.jpg"> <div> <FONT SIZE="5" COLOR="#000000" FACE="Arial" ><B>Warp Experience</B></FONT><B>     </B><B>|</B><B>     </B><A HREF="index.htm" TARGET="_top" TITLE="Warp Experience"><U><B>home</B></U></A><B>     </B></div> <bR> <div> </div> </td> </tr><tr> <td valign="top" height=380 colspan=2 BGCOLOR="#CCCC99" TEXT="#080000" bgproperties="fixed" background="0408dfc3.jpg"> <bR> <bR> <div> <B>The essence of mediocrity is the belief that </B><B>an appearance of approval</B><B> is </B><B>a real value</B><B>. Hence symbols of disapproval cause irritation.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Mediocrity is the condition exhibited through being anchored to the </B><B>notion </B><B>that I need to </B><B>belong</B><B> to a WINNING VIEW. </B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Idiots anchored to a bruise.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The top-dogs of the mediocre pack transmit their belief that they are the exponents of a view which is superior to all the other </B><B>competing views.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Holding a particular view moulds a specific attitude.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>`Top-dog is an attitude'.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Did the Twin Towers represent an attitude?</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Did the attack on the Towers represent an attitude?</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Of course the Twin Towers were </B><B>viewed</B><B> from polar opposites.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>My view </B><B>includes</B><B> your view, but your view doesn't include my view, therefore because I hold the </B><B>winning view</B><B>...I can take from you anything I want belonging to your </B><B>defeated view</B><B>.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The conned-senses `mind'. The sargossa of mediocrity. Engineering self-promotion.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The mediocre pack is called "WE".</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>We </B><B>need</B><B> "WE" is the name of the bureaucratic game of defending mediocrity.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>"Yes, you need us" cements the pact.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>That's the way you're farmed...is the fact.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Wanting to </B><B>have </B><B>a superior ( i.e. winning ) view, is what fuels the machine grinding down actual potential.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The attack on the Twin Towers was tit for tat. Tit and tat...</B><B>BOTH </B><B>forms of</B><B> </B><B>mediocrity.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The Tit Twin Towers and the Tat attackers are the two poles of the same uroboros-machine enforcing universal </B><B>boredom.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Don't </B><B>T.V. adverts</B><B> </B><B>SUDDENLY </B><B>ATTACK stability derived from con-text.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Attack attention span</B></div> <bR> <bR> <div> <B>Was the attack on the Twin Towers an attack on an </B><B>attacking mind-set?</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Was it a Twin Towers' editorial revision?</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>What does the conned-senses commercial attacking mind-set attack?</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Non-competitive </B><B>tranquility.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>What does the industrial war machine </B><B>defend?</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>Mediocrity</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The Bush/Blair word-war on so-called `terrorism' is a continuation of the Thatcher war on flower-power...on real un-official FREEDOM.</B></div> <bR> <div> <B>The freedom from tit tat uniformity.</B></div> </td> </tr></table></body>